Data story · ESAT · Cambridge, 2025 entry

50 of the 102 Cambridge Engineering applicants who averaged 8.0 or more on the ESAT got no offer, while 64 offers went to applicants averaging under 5.0

Cambridge released every 2025-entry applicant's ESAT scores and outcome. Offer rates rise with the score, but no score guaranteed an offer and no published score ruled one out.

390 of 3,179Engineering applicants with three module scores got an offer (12%)Official data
52 of 102Engineering applicants averaging 8.0 to 9.0 got an offer; the rest did notOfficial data
58% vs 12%Engineering offer rate at an average of 6.0 to 6.9: Home against international applicantsOfficial data

Cambridge offer rate by average ESAT module score, 2025 entry

Share of applicants in each score band who received an offer. Band = average of the three required module scores, 1.0 to 9.0.

Data (CSV)
  • Offer rate, counted from the FOI rows
  • Fewer than 30 applicants: count only, no rate
Engineering3,179 applicants, 390 offers (12%)0%25%50%75%100%0%1660%2245Engineering, average 3.0 to 3.9: 2 offers from 691 applicants (0%)0%3691Engineering, average 4.0 to 4.9: 62 offers from 954 applicants (6%)6%4954Engineering, average 5.0 to 5.9: 130 offers from 614 applicants (21%)21%5614Engineering, average 6.0 to 6.9: 78 offers from 318 applicants (25%)25%6318Engineering, average 7.0 to 7.9: 66 offers from 189 applicants (35%)35%7189Engineering, average 8.0 to 9.0: 52 offers from 102 applicants (51%)51%8102Natural Sciences (Physical)1,431 applicants, 381 offers (27%)0%25%50%75%100%Natural Sciences (Physical), average 1.0 to 1.9: 0 offers from 23 applicants: too few for a rate0/23123Natural Sciences (Physical), average 2.0 to 2.9: 1 offers from 85 applicants (1%)1%285Natural Sciences (Physical), average 3.0 to 3.9: 14 offers from 243 applicants (6%)6%3243Natural Sciences (Physical), average 4.0 to 4.9: 61 offers from 385 applicants (16%)16%4385Natural Sciences (Physical), average 5.0 to 5.9: 114 offers from 311 applicants (37%)37%5311Natural Sciences (Physical), average 6.0 to 6.9: 80 offers from 190 applicants (42%)42%6190Natural Sciences (Physical), average 7.0 to 7.9: 60 offers from 107 applicants (56%)56%7107Natural Sciences (Physical), average 8.0 to 9.0: 51 offers from 87 applicants (59%)59%887Natural Sciences (Biological)1,130 applicants, 287 offers (25%)0%25%50%75%100%Natural Sciences (Biological), average 1.0 to 1.9: 0 offers from 22 applicants: too few for a rate0/22122Natural Sciences (Biological), average 2.0 to 2.9: 2 offers from 73 applicants (3%)3%273Natural Sciences (Biological), average 3.0 to 3.9: 22 offers from 222 applicants (10%)10%3222Natural Sciences (Biological), average 4.0 to 4.9: 70 offers from 330 applicants (21%)21%4330Natural Sciences (Biological), average 5.0 to 5.9: 91 offers from 229 applicants (40%)40%5229Natural Sciences (Biological), average 6.0 to 6.9: 53 offers from 158 applicants (34%)34%6158Natural Sciences (Biological), average 7.0 to 7.9: 35 offers from 72 applicants (49%)49%772Natural Sciences (Biological), average 8.0 to 9.0: 14 offers from 24 applicants: too few for a rate14/24824Under each column: average score band (1 = 1.0 to 1.9 … 8 = 8.0 to 9.0) and applicants in itEngineering3,179 applicants, 390 offers (12%)0%25%50%75%100%0%1660%2245Engineering, average 3.0 to 3.9: 2 offers from 691 applicants (0%)0%3691Engineering, average 4.0 to 4.9: 62 offers from 954 applicants (6%)6%4954Engineering, average 5.0 to 5.9: 130 offers from 614 applicants (21%)21%5614Engineering, average 6.0 to 6.9: 78 offers from 318 applicants (25%)25%6318Engineering, average 7.0 to 7.9: 66 offers from 189 applicants (35%)35%7189Engineering, average 8.0 to 9.0: 52 offers from 102 applicants (51%)51%8102Natural Sciences (Physical)1,431 applicants, 381 offers (27%)0%25%50%75%100%Natural Sciences (Physical), average 1.0 to 1.9: 0 offers from 23 applicants: too few for a rate0/23123Natural Sciences (Physical), average 2.0 to 2.9: 1 offers from 85 applicants (1%)1%285Natural Sciences (Physical), average 3.0 to 3.9: 14 offers from 243 applicants (6%)6%3243Natural Sciences (Physical), average 4.0 to 4.9: 61 offers from 385 applicants (16%)16%4385Natural Sciences (Physical), average 5.0 to 5.9: 114 offers from 311 applicants (37%)37%5311Natural Sciences (Physical), average 6.0 to 6.9: 80 offers from 190 applicants (42%)42%6190Natural Sciences (Physical), average 7.0 to 7.9: 60 offers from 107 applicants (56%)56%7107Natural Sciences (Physical), average 8.0 to 9.0: 51 offers from 87 applicants (59%)59%887Natural Sciences (Biological)1,130 applicants, 287 offers (25%)0%25%50%75%100%Natural Sciences (Biological), average 1.0 to 1.9: 0 offers from 22 applicants: too few for a rate0/22122Natural Sciences (Biological), average 2.0 to 2.9: 2 offers from 73 applicants (3%)3%273Natural Sciences (Biological), average 3.0 to 3.9: 22 offers from 222 applicants (10%)10%3222Natural Sciences (Biological), average 4.0 to 4.9: 70 offers from 330 applicants (21%)21%4330Natural Sciences (Biological), average 5.0 to 5.9: 91 offers from 229 applicants (40%)40%5229Natural Sciences (Biological), average 6.0 to 6.9: 53 offers from 158 applicants (34%)34%6158Natural Sciences (Biological), average 7.0 to 7.9: 35 offers from 72 applicants (49%)49%772Natural Sciences (Biological), average 8.0 to 9.0: 14 offers from 24 applicants: too few for a rate14/24824Under each column: score band (1 = 1.0 to 1.9… 8 = 8.0 to 9.0) and applicants in it

ESAT; Cambridge 2025 entry; 3,179 Engineering, 1,431 Physical and 1,130 Biological Natural Sciences applicants with three module scores; offer rate by band; counted from official FOI rows (FOI-2025-1098, FOI-2025-1026); data version 2026-09-26.1

What the data shows

There is no ESAT pass mark

Cambridge sets no minimum ESAT score, and the rows show why a single number would mislead. In Engineering, the offer rate climbed from 6% of applicants averaging 4.0 to 4.9 to 21% at 5.0 to 5.9, 35% at 7.0 to 7.9 and 51% at 8.0 and above. The lowest band with an offer was 3.0 to 3.9 (2 of 691). Offer holders averaged 6.28; half of them averaged below 6.02.

Natural Sciences is flatter

In Physical Natural Sciences, 76 of 381 offers (20%) went to applicants averaging under 5.0; in Biological Natural Sciences it was 94 of 287 (33%), against 64 of 390 (16%) in Engineering. The top band in Biological Natural Sciences holds only 24 applicants, too few for a reliable rate, so the chart shows its count alone.

Home and international applicants were not on one line

At the same average of 6.0 to 6.9, 49 of 85 Home Engineering applicants got an offer (58%) against 29 of 233 international applicants (12%). International offer holders averaged 7.28, Home offer holders 5.73. The release records declared domicile only; it does not say why the rates differ, and domicile is not fee status.

What it means for 2026 applicants

Read a band as what happened to last year's applicants with similar scores, not as a chance. Interviews, predicted grades, school references and college decisions are not in the data, and the 2026 cohort sits a test whose scores are rescaled every year.

What this does not show

  • These are 2025-entry applicants (ESAT sat in October 2024 or January 2025). No release yet covers 2026 entry.
  • The module average is our calculation: the mean of the three module scores each course requires. Cambridge publishes no combined ESAT score and does not say it averages modules.
  • 9 of 3,188 Engineering rows and 13 of 2,574 Natural Sciences rows are left out: 14 have fewer than three module scores and 8 name no Biological or Physical route. Cambridge's own Natural Sciences totals (2,625 applicants) also include 59 records released without scores.
  • No release gives interview figures, so the data cannot separate who was interviewed from who was offered a place.
  • Bands with fewer than 30 applicants show counts only. The 95% ranges describe the past band, not any one applicant.
  • An association between scores and offers is not the reason for an offer. Grades, interview, context and college all differ between applicants.

Cite this

ESATGenius (2026). What ESAT scores got Cambridge offers? The 2025-entry data. Published 27 September 2026, version 2026-09-27.1. https://esatgenius.com/data/cambridge-esat-offers-2025

Chart credit
Source: ESATGenius analysis of University of Cambridge data
Version
2026-09-27.1, published 27 September 2026

You are welcome to quote the findings and reproduce the chart with the credit above and a link to this page. Please cite the original publishers too; their figures remain theirs. Corrections and new releases are added as new versions, and earlier numbers stay listed in the change log below.

Method and sources

  1. Read every applicant row from Cambridge's FOI-2025-1098 (Engineering, 3,188 rows) and FOI-2025-1026 (Natural Sciences, 2,574 rows), through their public WhatDoTheyKnow copies. Applicant ids are the release's own anonymous row numbers; none is shown here.
  2. Kept rows with exactly three module scores and, for Natural Sciences, a Biological or Physical route.
  3. Averaged each applicant's three module scores and placed them in 1-point bands (the top band includes 9.0).
  4. Counted applicants and offers in each band; offer rate = offers / applicants, with a Wilson 95% range where a band holds 30 or more.
  5. Checked the counts against the research build (Engineering 3,179, Physical 1,431, Biological 1,130) and Cambridge's FOI-2025-982 domicile means.

Sources

Data and versions

  • Cambridge Engineering and Natural Sciences applicants' ESAT scores and offers, 2025: version 2026-09-26.1, checked 26 September 2026 (historical). First published version, transcribed by script from the 26 September 2026 ESAT research snapshot.
  • This story: version 2026-09-27.1, first published 27 September 2026.

Download the chart data as CSV (UTF-8, one row per chart value, no personal data).

Keep going

© 2026 ESATGenius. An independent study resource, not affiliated with universities or test providers.Privacy